A Consolidatory Advance: “Words”.

A few posts ago
in
“Wording “crucialities”[*]
we encountered the
Massively-Complex
[and “corrupted”]
Need & Problem of
“Clear Communication”.

We “defensively” considered
“differentiating”
between ten (10) “levels” of “Wordings”.

We had to begin by
actually taking time to
comprehend
any
“nonsense” –
“gobbledegook”,
“pseuso-neologistics”
“quixotics”
and any other
Pre-Descriptively-Definitive definiens.
[Academicly the three levels of Definition being
(I)
Descriptive
[for General-Everyday Dictionary Lifeplace Usage]
(ii)
Prescriptive
[for Workplace-specific usage].
(iii)
Stipulative
[for ‘authoritative-individual usage’
i.e. such as may be ‘uniquely’defined by a lecturing professor;
and as similarly ‘uniquely’ defined
being utilised by a Journalist
– even in the popular daily media.
======================================
HOWEVER
As
“maturely-responsible and response-able”
human-beings
and
“democratic scrutinisers”,
we need to be aware of,
and to sequentially utilise,
some
Ten levels of “Wording” definitions
and their definiens (component-parts).
e.g.
most
“-ish” and “-ishly” word-endings
need to be dealt with under category “0” –
as
“informal”,
“pre-definitively-descriptive”
“neologistic”
“nonsense”
words.

Our human & democratic “watch”
tells us that we need a “reform-era” –
even a
constitution-&-infrastructure
“peaceful-revolution”
to include
a second level of Descriptive Dictionary
for the “informal” terminologies
such as (both) “peckish” and “happy-ish”.
—————————–
FURTHERMORE

“Sustain-Worthy”
is
almost
a ‘new’ multi-level
descriptive, prescriptive and stipulative term,
viz
our need to
“sustain”
both EarthLife
and our likewise longest-term
Human-Civilisational Lifesupports.

“We need to make ‘sustainability’
definiensly
‘sustain-worthy’ –

or perish
as did the Hitlerian Third Reich’s
>10 years of “sustainability” –
[because it was never “sustain-worthy“].

==================================
http://lifefresh.net ‘s
“Ten Steps to Verbal Communication Clarifying”
is worth “daily-revisiting and development”.

Firstly we need to be cognisant of
(0)
The Misinformational definiens
[including the Dis-informational
and
the “Enthymemous”
[missing/deliberately-excluded]
definiens.

Thereafter
we aim to be
“free-er”
to scrutinise –

(1)
The unacceptable and ‘slang’ word-item definiens.
(2)
The pre-Descriptive “loosely-expressional” definiens.
(3)
The Formally Descriptive definiens.
(4)
The Publicly-Utilisable Prescriptive definiens.
(5)
The ‘Workplace-Only’ Prescriptive definiens.
(6)
The Publicly-Comprehensible Stipulative definiens.
(7)
The ‘Workplace-Only Stipulative definiens.
(8)
The Public-Non-Knowable Secret definiens.
(9)
The Workplace Top-Secret definiens.
====================================
0753 –> 0759 –>T 270721 —>

____________________