“Essential-Efficiency”

It is suggested that,
since Nature accepts certain
“inefficiencies” *

Humankind is both
“naturally-under-efficient”
and
“civilisationally-sufficiently-efficient”.

But that is
“anthropocentricly-flawed argumentation”
since civilisationally, Humankind is
under-bio-efficient ***.

—————-
e.g. In-the-wild,
trees
achieve only 89% “growth-&-‘health’-efficiency”
[whereas under human-civilisational-nursery conditions
they can be edged-on to almost 95% ‘efficiency’ [**]
———-

[**]
approximational-figures
————————–
***
In order to fulfil the
Humankind-Civilisational-Social-Mobility-Standard,
the human-being
‘apparently’
“‘needs”
progressively more numerous quantities of
Lifesupportive-Human-Livings/Incomes:
which may appear to be Workplace-relevantly-efficient
but can not be
nor be argued to be
Lifeplace-Personally-Efficient.
=============================================