Those persons and organisations
planning & implementing
have already succumbed to a
[Anon. Paraphrased from memory by this e-site’s publisher “JSDM”].
THE ‘NARRATIONAL’ REASONING
That the holisticly-natural
of the human-being
need to be additionally
the civilisationally-developing parts
of both the individual and the collective human-being
may be “clear” and “obvious” to some –
(especially, one would expect, to our Emulable Lifeplace-Leaders)
if not immediately seen and ‘pro-actively-understood’
by all burgeoning-8-billion
of us humans-on-Earth.
But the ubiquitous worldwide web could bring us all up-to-date
in a matter of mere minutes and days.
WHAT ARE ‘NON_SUSTAINWORTHY”
(i) Non-Sustainworthy suggests
(ii) un-sustainworthy suggests
was once believed sustainworthy
but has had to be ‘reversed’ and re-defined as being “un-sustainworthy”.
The human-being who
“has to have”
two or more human-livings
is thereby made only 50%-or-more
in the Lifeplace*
Re=Evaluation Rule #1 :-
The more human-livings a person takes
the less sustainworthy-&-sustainworthying
s/he has become**
in and for the Lifeplace.
** … and may be ‘permanently stuck’ in
and warmongeringly supportive of
* The Lifeplace is 128 hours-per-week
The Workplace 40 hrs/week.