Sustainworthy Evaluation

[“]
Those persons and organisations

not

sustainworthyingly

planning & implementing
both
the Immediate
and
the Longest-Term

Human-Future

have already succumbed to a

‘longshot’-gambled
non-sustainworthily
already-botch-planned,
constituted
and-run-away wastefully
life-extinctingly
-&-
lifesupports-destructively
implemented
Present

&-
Future. {“}
———–
[Anon. Paraphrased from memory by this e-site’s publisher “JSDM”].

THE ‘NARRATIONAL’ REASONING

That the holisticly-natural
evolving parts
of the human-being
need to be additionally
nurtured
by
the civilisationally-developing parts
of both the individual and the collective human-being

may be “clear” and “obvious” to some –
(especially, one would expect, to our Emulable Lifeplace-Leaders)
if not immediately seen and ‘pro-actively-understood’
by all burgeoning-8-billion
of us humans-on-Earth.
————–
But the ubiquitous worldwide web could bring us all up-to-date
in a matter of mere minutes and days.
==========================================================

WHAT ARE ‘NON_SUSTAINWORTHY”
AND
‘UN-SUSTAINWORTHY
FACTORS ?

(i) Non-Sustainworthy suggests
“never-was-nor-ever-can-be sustain-worthy;
(ii) un-sustainworthy suggests
was once believed sustainworthy
but has had to be ‘reversed’ and re-defined as being “un-sustainworthy”.

FURTHER
The human-being who
“has to have”
two or more human-livings
is thereby made only 50%-or-more
personally-efficient
at ‘making-ends-meet’
in the Lifeplace*

Re=Evaluation Rule #1 :-
The more human-livings a person takes
the less sustainworthy-&-sustainworthying
s/he has become**
in and for the Lifeplace.
—————–
** … and may be ‘permanently stuck’ in
and warmongeringly supportive of
(non-sustainworthiness)
========================
* The Lifeplace is 128 hours-per-week
The Workplace 40 hrs/week.

Leave a Reply