“Public Scrutinisation”

INSTANCE
Today’s early News channel (BBC)
a scrutiny question concerning the likely or ‘possible’

“obstruction of justice”

by someone who has made
a public announcement , statement,
or ‘official’-declaration
“but”
when further adversarially ‘cross-examined’
(by a different “interested-party”)
chooses to stand by their initial core-statement
under the words
[“] all I have to say is in my previous statement,
and I have nothing further to say [“].

Our obvious ‘worldwide-public mindful-question’
is surely something like:-

“So,
since the Constitution itself must surely be failing
for instance
to provide for
Lifeplace(*) Individual Human Development.
and instead
allowing
and even monopolisticly-supporting
“uncapped individual Profiteering,
Power-Accruing
and
Delusory-Prestige-Stacking

then

the Constitution itself is “obstructing justice”
?
====================================================
(*) Our Lifeplace is of 128 hours weekly duration
and requires wide and varying levels of “enablement”
[as distinct from clearer-cut-demanding Workplace-skills];
whereas
the Workplace is only 40 hours duration,
requires salutary “skillings”,
and evidences other definitive differences
in contrast to the Lifeplace’s Needs-&-Hows.