Your pleasure,
should you choose to exercise it,
might be to put the following list of Factors in some prioritous-order
and to complete it as far as you find possible :-
—
(1) (a) Publicly deconflate, distinguish, and dictionary-constitute such verbal-differences as
(i) Workplace “leaders” [who are in fact non-emulable commanders anyway]
(versus as-it-were)
(ii) Lifeplace leaders who “by definition” need to be both emulable and exemplary
—
(2) Voting needs to be for Lists of Needs and their Priorities and “How-Best-Satisfied”
instead of for
hundreds of failed and further-failing representative-advocates
as “our” members-of-parliament and “enforcement rulers”
[who are dominantly lawyers and overpaid ‘private-individual-capitalists’ as well]
–
(3) Do away with the farce of “public debating”
and establish the proper participatory and objective democratic sequence of
(i) Cooperatively sharing all of the relevant Information for public-focused-conversation
(around neighbourhood Round-Tables and in successive Plenums)
(ii) Cooperatively seriously and in-depth discussing that Information and our Needs and Hows
(iii) Leave the “debating” = “only one side can win: the other must lose” smoke-and-mirrors politicians-dominating public “debating”
until last of all
and confine it to two much smaller, and more merit and life-experience-worthy peoples’-advocates stocked,
Houses
whereby
once the Democratic Vote for Lists of Needs & Hows is established
(iv) a reformed Civil Service could do the offices and paperwork {there are already “surfeits” of both Civil Servants and Parliamentarians
and
(v) there will be needed only a numbers-reduced, “decimated”, Houses of Parliament
where workplace-merit and lifeplace-emulable leadership
would be the primary qualifications –
and
(vi) we would no longer constitutionally “need” such inaccessibly-remote, “machine-like”, and “hot-air” apologies for a Democratic Parliamentary System.
( continuable )
——- 1800 M 19 06 17 — jsdm 1815 ——– 1818 —