Publisher’s Response to Messages Received (up to 1300 Tuesday 07 February 2017; further checked W 01.05.2019)

Thank you, to each and all responders so far.

In these three “Sustainworthying” and “Holistic-Health-Building-Supportive” e-sites, we use –
among other Constructive-Dialogue Facilitations such as Method III ‘No-Lose’ Cooperative Problem Solving & Six Cooperatively-Constructive Thinking Modes –
the Three Principles of Good Two-&-Multiway-Communication and of Honest Argumentation
[1..Clarity;  2.Charity;  3. Self-Corrigibility ].

This publisher finds your messages to be positively-supportive of the websites and of the “spirit” therein; which is  a definite “move forward” for “Sustainworthynessing”


the one single thing missing from your responses happens to be the most vitally essential thing of all –
“engaging with the facts and factors of the published Topic”.

In the spirit of the second of the Three Good Communication Principles I have decided
to publish your names-or-pseudonyms,
and the non-self-advertising message-contents
as will follow today (Tuesday 07 February 2017) in order of time/date of receipt

=========================================== 1250 T 07 02 17   =================================================

Post title:  “So Who’s Duty Was it … e.g. to provide holistic-health-building-services ? …

May I simply just say what a relief to uncover
an individual who really understands what they’re talking
about on the net. You definitely understand how
to bring an issue to light and make it important.
More and more people need to check this out and understand this side of your story.
I can’t believe you are not more popular since you definitely
possess the gift.


Post Title:  Supposing There’s a Time Limit to Each Alternative Way Forward ?

Great post. I used to be checking continuously this blog and I am inspired!
Very useful info particularly the closing part 
 I care for such info a lot.
I used to be seeking this particular info for a long time. Thank you and good luck.

Post Title:  Supposing There’s a Time Limit to Each Alternative Way Forward ?

Excellent pieces. Keep posting such kind of information on your site. I’m really impressed by your blog.


Post title:  Supposing There’s a Time Limit to Each Alternative Way Forward ?

Hi,  (if)  you visited my weblog I came to “return the favor”.
I’m trying to find things to enhance my site!
I suppose its ok to use some of this one !


Post title:  Supposing There’s a Time Limit to Each Alternative Way Forward ?

I got this web site from my friend who shared with me about this site
and at the moment this time, I am browsing this web site
and reading very informative content here.


(1) “S” :replying to the “…GOD…” loose topic-idea,
asked the publisher for clarity “What does this weird-seeming topic mean ?”
[this publisher then published extensive explanation and self-correction -]

Publisher’s further note:
Perhaps next time a “weird” looking topic or phrase appears, why don’t we “take it by the horns”
and “lead-the-scrutiny-analysis” with our own individual thinking –
or with a relevant-looking quote from Wikipedia or somewhere else “reasonably-established” -: .

(2)  Participants might note the shared-usefulness of up-front indicating why you do not address the topic’s facts and factors,
it is also also “given” that these e-sites topics are mostly “proposed-interim-wordings“..needing discussion, refinement, develeopment.

Without such engagement with the intention and actual content of the Topic, a reply-message sadly tends to fall under the “SPAM” category.
All that can then be done  
is to edit the submitted message as verbatimly as possible,
and publish that – “charitably”.   

Regards,  Publisher.
1250 T 07 02 17 ,