“Exercise1.1 the first in Johnson-& Johnson ‘s Joining Together 4th ed 1991Advises us [“requires” career-registered students] to (i) List every-thing [jsdm] you do in a typical day from the moment you wake up to the moment you fall asleep.(ii) Delete from yourn…
Co-Collecting “Must-be’s”
Both “Foundationals” and “Sine Qua Nons”* are “must-be’s” So also are such HeadTerms as ‘Basics’, Pre-Requisites, ‘Mandatories’. Andin downwards-diminishing order we might allow‘Qualifications’ to be axiomatic ** ‘pragmatically-necessary’, —— – but we’re talking there of “Humankind-Essentials” such as have become…
The “O & O” Sine Qua Non
The (absolutely-essential first-&-primarily can’t-begin-without)ampersandpre-non-negotiabletherefore-one-&-onlyessential – already must-have-been … SOMETHING ~ “something-or-other” and since, already following, ‘was’ now ‘must-be-or-not-be’“is” thenour one-and-only-connective must be(“TALLY-HO–>” – like ) Let’s be getting on with it … 1206 gone
sine qua nons
“Without-which-nothing(s)”
Fallacious Foundations ?
The post below [“Re-Foundationing – possible?”]contains a ‘glaring’ fallacy: an historic instance of which is possibly still very-much-with-us “Both the USSR and the USA have enough nuclear-bombs to destroy the world 27-times over“.————– To which the first “How To ‘Win’…
Re-Foundationing – possible ?
It is becoming clearer and clearerthat all human-civilisations so far have been not so much “not-fit-for-purpose” *as faultily-and-therefore- fatallyfounded otherwise they would none of them have failed ? – as ours is now failing too, or “about-to” ?